Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Proposed "header.b" tag for DKIM signatures

  On 3/24/10 2:37 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The spec says a minimum of eight, but enough to be able to be unambiguous.  A 
> few security types around the IETF I've polled about this seem to think 
> that's adequate.

Eight bytes is a large amount of pseudo-random data that is being keyed 
from a supposedly trusted source, so I don't see a problem.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html