Earl Hood <earl(_at_)earlhood(_dot_)com> wrote:
Are there plans for the procmail maintainers to patch the regular
distribution?
I'd prefer not to change mharc to work-around this bug in procmail and
netbsd, especially if there is a functional patch for procmail that
fixes the problem.
I don't think taking the address of an int and using it as a
size for realloc() can be considered a procmail/netbsd bug. That's
strictly procmail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo(_at_)mhonarc(_dot_)org with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE MHARC-USERS
