Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)cmf(_dot_)nrl(_dot_)navy(_dot_)mil> wrote on Feb 26,
2004:
Does 2.1 always install sasl.h in a "sasl" subdirectory? If so,
you could change it from #include <sasl.h> to #include <sasl/sasl.h> to get
around the problem.
No, traditionally (installing it from the SASL distribution) it gets
installed in $(prefix)/include. Sigh, another RedHat difference.
Strange.
On my system, the headers were all installed in $(prefix)/include/sasl
The headers for 1.5 were installed in $(prefix)/include
Otherwise, some autoconf support will be necessary.
Since you can specify CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include/sasl, I don't think it's
That's probably a mistake. The "#include" statements should be
specify "<sasl/sasl.h>". It is usually bad practice to list a
subdirectory of "/usr/include" in a "-I" directive.
-NWR
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers