nmh-workers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Questionable code in m_chkids() in sbr/context_save.c

2005-05-18 13:10:11
Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)cmf(_dot_)nrl(_dot_)navy(_dot_)mil> wrote on May 18, 
2005:

(AFAIK sendmail and friends always run stuff under the user's real and
effective uid, so I don't think slocal should ever be setuid).

If you run "slocal" from ".forward", then it runs as the recipient
(the person using ".forward").  But there are advantages to running
slocal as a mailer defined in sendmail.cf

Do people even _do_ that?  I've written sendmail mailers myself, but
I can't really see any advantage for doing this here.

I certainly do that (define slocal as a mailer).

Advantages:

It allows me to use the "source" and "addr" attributes in my
".maildelivery" file.  With the way I have defined the mailer,
"source" references the envelope sender, and "addr" references
the "detail" part of "loginid+detail".  For example, the mail 
for nmh-workers is addressed to me at "rickert+nmh", and I have
that sorted into my nmh folder with the line

addr    nmh     +       ?       +nmh

 -NWR




_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>