On Tue, 17 May 2005 16:11:59 CDT, Chris Garrigues said:
The most important thing not to break are the frontends (exmh, mhe, etc) but let's not be afraid of breaking them in the short term because in the long term, whatever problems turn up can be fixed.
We've mh-e people stand up, and Chris and myself can probably handle any breakage in exmh - but there's one caveat: If you make a change that modifies the line-mode flags (or default values for same) please speak up so us maintainers of layered stuff know something happened. It's really easy to deal with a mail that says "I just commited a change that adds a new flag -foobar to 'inc' - please test". It's a lot harder to troubleshoot 3 weeks later. ;) Is it possible to gate CVS commit messages to this list, or start an nmh-commits list for same? Then if people use sane messages in their 'cvs commit', all the rest is easy once it's set up. ;)
pgpbZgNhBpmRz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Questionable code in m_chkids() in sbr/context_save.c, Neil W Rickert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Questionable code - the bigger picture, Mike O'Dell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Questionable code - the bigger picture, Peter S Galbraith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Questionable code - the bigger picture, Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |