Oliver Kiddle wrote:
undo of install-mh
Nobody would ever run an uninstall-mh script and I doubt that the
person raising the bug was a user looking for it. Most software
creates a pile of dot files without even asking these days. If
any fix is necessary, I'd vote for a tiny bit more detail in the
man page - less than the original patch included.
What did you think of my proposed patch to the manpage?
gcc warnings: possible use of uninitialized data
I'm not so keen on initialising variables that don't need
initialising. That said, it'd be good to kill a few compile
warnings.
See my email on those -- I think the ones not yet committed are
ones where there's a genuine bug to be fixed (or an obvious but
larger code cleanup), and should not be squashed just by putting
an initialisation on the variable.
I would have thought the following would be uncontroversial.
improvement of folder man page
-link instead of -unlink in rmm.man
small fix for configure.in (nmhman expansion)
slocal.man .TP
Any objections if I apply those?
I thought I'd committed at least some of those to the cvs repo.
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers