Lyndon Nerenberg writes:
On 2012-03-15, at 6:37 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:With X-MH-Attachment?Could we please use nmh-* for this stuff? Just to make it clear this is nmh-specific?
Are you suggesting having a header like nmh-attachment which is rfc-problematic or just that we change the MH to NMH? Jon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Ken Hornstein |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |