On 2012-03-15, at 6:50 PM, Jon Steinhart wrote:
Are you suggesting having a header like nmh-attachment which is
rfc-problematic
or just that we change the MH to NMH?
x-* is dead. If we're going to abuse the header namespace for things that
trigger nmh-specific functionality, let's at least put them in a namespace that
we can succinctly document as "these are not real rfc2822 messages headers;
instead they trigger internal nmh actions."
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers