Ken wrote:
That is basically the same thing as doing a rebase, except that way is more work. It would invalidate every checked-out copy of the revision control tree. It _might_ be useful, but would it be worth it?
I think not, if there's not a reasonable way to deal with checked-out copies. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Nmh-workers] 1.5 release and better repl/MIME handling, Ken Hornstein |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | [Nmh-workers] Bursting digests, Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |