On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:32:59 -0500, David Levine said:
64 bytes? Though 64 bits seems too short.
64 bits should be plenty. At that point, the chances of an accidental collision of Message-ID:s due to a crypto failure is already far below other software bugs causing Message-IDs to be reused. Remember, Message-ID isn't guaranteed to be crypto-secure - we'd need a *lot* more infrastructure worldwide to actually guarantee that. (Remember that many of us store those Message-ID's in 'procmail -D' files. No sense in bloating them beyond what's needed ;)
pgpRQPgaiz9nl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, David Levine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Lyndon Nerenberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, David Levine |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Lyndon Nerenberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |