Valdis wrote:
Looks good to me - but will some busticated software that assumes everything
after the @ is syntactically (if not semantically) a "hostname" get upset at
the + in there? (Personally, I don't care, all of my stuff just want a unique
string inside the <>, and if my stuff is busted I'll beat the snot out of
whoever
wrote it and then get it fixed ;)
I'll find out :-)
Non-qualified hostnames do get used, even to this list. I
looked at a small collection of spam and saw hardly any
random "hostname" parts, but the sample is biased (it got
through some filters) and very small.
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers