Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?

I don't really understand how relative numbers are useful, but if they are to be
introduced why not use the same signifier as for folders? i.e; @

cur@2 = cur+2  cur@-4 = cur-4

This could also prevent some confusion as to why we are using something with a
clear meaning (+) for such an odd purpose...

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers