nmh-workers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?

2012-10-14 17:28:12
ralph wrote:
Hi Paul,

jerrad wrote:
I don't really understand how relative numbers are useful, but if
they are to be introduced why not use the same signifier as for
folders?  i.e; @

cur@2 = cur+2  cur@-4 = cur-4
...
i'm also not sure how '@' relates to folders.

Perhaps Jerrad was referring to `@' being used instead of `+' for
relative folders.

    folder +inbox
    refile @example last    # Means +inbox/example.

huh.  i believe you, but you might have just found a bug in
the man pages. :-)  i can find no mention of such a feature.

paul
=---------------------
 paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma, 
where it's 55.2 degrees)

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>