Ralph wrote:
Does the test need to be in the for-loop, running on every message?
Perhaps
if (!strcmp(cp, current) &&
mp->curmsg >= mp->lowsel && mp->curmsg <= mp->hghsel) {
/* Removed current message indication, so reset curmsg. */
mp->curmsg = 0;
}
afterwards? (Note use of `current'.)
Got it. Committed. Thanks! David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?, Ralph Corderoy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?, Jerrad Pierce |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Clearing `cur' Message., Ralph Corderoy |
| Next by Thread: | [Nmh-workers] blind list expansion bug, David Levine |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |