Kevin Cosgrove <kevinc(_at_)cosgroves(_dot_)us> writes:
On 11 October 2012 at 10:35, Joel Uckelman <uckelman(_at_)nomic(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Speaking for myself only: I can't recall a single time in 15 years of
using nmh that I've wanted to use sortm to sort less than a complete
folder.
I have two use cases for sortm
1. sortm +folder
2. sortm -textfield subject -limit 0 +folder
Me too. I don't think I've ever used sortm with a sequence.
Glad -all became the default. Throwing an error if explicit messages
were not specified would have broken MH-E.
--
Bill Wohler <wohler(_at_)newt(_dot_)com> aka
<Bill(_dot_)Wohler(_at_)nasa(_dot_)gov>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers