nmh-workers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?

2012-11-23 13:36:06
Jerrad Pierce <belg4mit(_at_)pthbb(_dot_)org> writes:

Perhaps Jerrad was referring to `@' being used instead of `+' for
relative folders.
You are correct sir.

If it's not in the man pages, it must have been something
I picked up from the Jerry's MH book.

Yep.

http://rand-mh.sourceforge.net/book/mh/fol.html#RelNam

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler(_at_)newt(_dot_)com> aka 
<Bill(_dot_)Wohler(_at_)nasa(_dot_)gov>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD


_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?, Bill Wohler <=