Ralph pointed out earlier that with the proliferation of RFC 2047-encoded headers, pick is much less useful. I'm wondering ... would it make sense to simply have pick run the RFC 2047 decoder on headers before matching them? As far as I can tell we can decode all headers except for Received: headers. Thoughts? --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies., Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Bill Wohler |
Previous by Thread: | [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies., Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] pick(1) decode RFC-2047 headers?, P Vixie |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |