Okay, you're going to (fairly) point out this makes things harder.
I can't disagree with that. It's just ... we're starting to now
grapple with some truely hard problems, like how exactly a MIME
reply is supposed to work. This is something a lot of MUAs don't
deal with very well. I think we owe it to ourselves to try to get
it right.
I'm not sure what "right" is here. Can we have a cleaner
interface to accept a calendar request than what's on phones
now? No, clicking on "accept" is as simple as it can get.
As a user, I'd be happy to use repl or some shell alias to do
it.
I was more thinking about preserving MH's historic flexibility. I guess
my point was I'd prefer something like this (all are aliases to 'repl')
calaccept: -typearg text/calendar accept
calreject: -typearg text/calendar reject
Rather than:
calaccept: -calendar accept
calreject: -calendar reject
Does that make sense? I don't really like the name 'typearg', I was just
trying to make the point that I'd like the options to repl be able to be
used for any MIME type.
--Ken
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers