On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:49:58 +0700, Robert Elz said:
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:49:25 -0400
From: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu>
Message-ID:
<42920(_dot_)1429660165(_at_)turing-police(_dot_)cc(_dot_)vt(_dot_)edu>
| Which of course in any standard-compliant MUA will almost certainly do
| one of the first two and never bother looking at the third one.
Without knowing what the parts contain, I can't say whether the format is
appropriate or not, but your interpretation of what should happen is
incorrect - a standards compliant MUA that understands text/calendar should
process that part (the last understood alternative is the one that is
supposed to be preferred)
Gaah. Pass me the caffeine, will ya? :) I got led down the primrose path of thinking it was the *first* understood one because I've seen far too many meeting invites that had crucial info buried in the text/html that would be ignored if only the text/calendar was processed.... ... though now I am starting to understand why I've been in so many meetings where it seems like only the organizer and myself had read the memo :)
pgppfxO33LeTY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers