Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:56:00 -0500
From: "John Covici" <covici(_at_)ccs(_dot_)covici(_dot_)com>
Message-ID: <002001d12abe$71d8ee10$558aca30$@ccs.covici.com>
| Well, that did not work, it kept regenerating the file all over again,
If that's happening, then something is broken on your system. Is the
date set correctly?
| I think my mistake was doing a make clean, but you still might
| want to fix a bug.
OK, so make clean removes dtimep.c (since it can be regenerated from
dtimep.l) - your flex (or lex) generates code that is C99 (has //
comments - for no rational reason at all incidentally, that's insane)
and then nmh compiles with -ansi and no c99 options, so // comments
aren't C.
That combination would do it.
Submit a bug report to whoever supplies the lex (or flex) that your
system uses (wherever the system came from) and complain about the
generation of c99 in what should be a generic C source file.
kre
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers