Andy Bradford writes:
Thus said David Levine on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 19:59:52 -0500:
Though looking at it now, we should probably move FreeBSD 9, OpenBSD,
and Solaris 11 to the was-known-in-the-distant-past-to-compile
category.
I've heard a rumor that BSD is dead, or at least in it's last throes...
Actually, I currently use nmh-1.6 (from ports) on OpenBSD 6.1. I also
just downloaded nmh-1.7 and it compiled cleanly. I haven't tried
using it though. Does that mean that it should be moved into the
``was-known-in-the-distant-past-to-compile'' category?
The OpenBSD package will be updated to 1.7 in a day or so.
I've been using rc3 for months and 1.7 since this week.
1 test failed:
*** /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.draft Thu Nov 30 00:04:52 2017
--- /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.expected Thu Nov 30 00:04:52 2017
***************
*** 18,24 ****
/9g=
------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0
! Content-Type: application/x-not-regular-file; name="nulls"
Content-Description: nulls
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nulls"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
--- 18,24 ----
OpenBSD's file(1) implementation apparently sees this file differently.
$ file -i nmh-1.7/test/mhbuild/nulls
nmh-1.7/test/mhbuild/nulls: application/x-not-regular-file
--
Anthony J. Bentley
--
Nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers