Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.7's putnum drops data if too close to end of line?

David Levine <levinedl@acm.org> writes:
> Tom wrote:
> > What I'd expect to happen, and what did happen before 1.7, is that the
> > size information would be there and would just be truncated if it didn't
> > fit in the available output width.

> The change was intentional, IIRC.  Better to truncate than show
> part of a number.  The parentheses in your format would reveal it,
> but without them, the output could be misleading with truncation.

Hm.  Is there a way to override that value judgment?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers