david wrote:
Paul wrote:
as far as i can tell, the -noprint switch to the folder command
is inoperative, since a line of code just below the argument parsing
loop sets the default value of printsw to be non-zero.
Yeah, looks like it's always (at least since 1989/06/26) been that way.
I use -f(ast), but it looks like -noprint would be a bit more efficient.
but that still prints the folder name, doesn't it? i think -noprint
might be totally silent. (of course, since it doesn't work, i don't
actually know. :-)
paul
i also see that -noprint isn't documented. perhaps not a coincidence?
i can fix it, if it seems that i'm reading this right.
Sure.
David
--
Nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=----------------------
paul fox, pgf@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 1.9 degrees)
--
Nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers