On Sat, 06 Jan 2018 00:19:31 +0000, Ralph Corderoy said:
That quickly bores. -noprint doesn't seem a good fit for a general `please be quiet'. If folder's regaining that functionality then perhaps it's the opportunity to use a more general, positive rather than negative, option? Especially if it has an often unambiguous abbreviation.
-silent?
pgpcWLOUnJeBR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |