Ralph wrote:
I thought the test should change to handle no iconv, iconv, and ice-age iconv
As in, now it doesn't handle the no-iconv case? I went that route in anticipation of removing support for that, with the benefit of not having to make the test more complicated. David -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Blockers for 1.7.1., Ralph Corderoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Blockers for 1.7.1., Ralph Corderoy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Blockers for 1.7.1., Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Blockers for 1.7.1., Ralph Corderoy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |