Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:
So ... I guess programs would look at the terminal and if your speed was
9600 baud or greater, you'd use VISUAL, and if it was slower you'd use
EDITOR? I could believe that (although from memory I don't recall vi
being that bad at 2400 baud, but it was a while ago!).
Speed wasn’t the only thing, remember. I certainly used a
hardcopy terminal in 1979, probably later (not connected to a
Unix system, but still), and neither vi nor emacs would have
been a good choice :-)
--
Jón Fairbairn
Jon(_dot_)Fairbairn(_at_)cl(_dot_)cam(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
--
nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers