On 12 Jun 2019 08:46:43 -0600 "Andy Bradford" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
[ part - text/plain - 577B ]
Thus said "Valdis Kl?tnieks" on Sat, 08 Jun 2019 21:26:46 -0400:
In a world of Microsoft Office attachments, is having -search go
through the body by default as well still a good idea? Maybe having a
separate -searchbody would be better?
Hard to say what it *should* be. In my environment, the majority of
messages that I use -search with do have searchable content in the body
of the message, so I've never really been concerned about it.
TAI64 timestamp: 400000005d011078
It's funny you say that! I did
pick -search Micro cur
"cur" being your message, and the search failed. The reason
being the body was MIME encoded because of UTF-8 even though
it is plain text. Here is a sample of what you see with
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: "nmh-workers" <email@example.com>