Just saw this for the first time: Content-Disposition: =?utf-8?Q?inline?= .. causing "mhshow: extraneous information in message 126's Content-Disposition: field (=?utf-8?Q?inline?=)". As far as I can see this is a MUST NOT do, but probably not too hard to accept and DTRT. Thoughts? Conrad
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Running Tests in Parallel. (Was: Make test-mhical pass with BSD yacc.), Ralph Corderoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Ken Hornstein |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nmh-commits] [SCM] The nmh Mail Handling System branch, master, updated. 1.7-branchpoint-587-g843bc85, Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |