Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft

Re Dave's item 2 about the new prototype certificate, I, too, was wondering
what was achieved by changing to a different format.  Is there some
benefit?

Charlie Gardiner

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, David M. Balenson Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Charles W. Gardiner <= Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Steve Kent Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Jeff Thompson Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Steve Kent Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Steve Kent Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Jeffrey I. Schiller Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, James M Galvin Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Charles W. Gardiner

Previous by Date:	Re: Two certificate hierarchy questions, Stephen D Crocker
Next by Date:	Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski
Previous by Thread:	Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, David M. Balenson
Next by Thread:	Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]