pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft

1992-04-14 22:40:00
   Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 09:58:45 -0400
   From: Steve Kent <kent(_at_)BBN(_dot_)COM>
   Sender: pem-dev-relay(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM

   Burt,

           I think your proposed conventions, which should be explcitly
   specified in the FORMS RFC, would be just fine.  I appreciate your
   willingness to compromise in an effort to move forward as quickly as
   possible.

           What does everyone else think?

I agree. In fact one of the "features" of this approach is the retention
of the validity interval. The requester of a certificate may well wish
to specify a validity interval which is different from the "default"
that the issuer might otherwise use (but of course the issuer will need
to judge whether the request is acceptable, what happens if it isn't is
a local matter (or a function of CA/PCA policy)).

                        -Jeff

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>