Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft

A very minor point: might serial number 0 be a better dummy value?  The first
certificate issued by out "manufacturing" box for the units it initializes
will have #1.  (We could, of course, arrange to have it start at 2, so it's
no big deal, but 1 might be used in some other situation.)

Charlie

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, (continued) Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Charles W. Gardiner Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Steve Kent Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Jeff Thompson Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Steve Kent Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Steve Kent Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Jeffrey I. Schiller Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, James M Galvin Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Charles W. Gardiner <= Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski

Previous by Date:	Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski
Next by Date:	Re: Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Steve Kent
Previous by Thread:	Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski
Next by Thread:	Revised "RFC [FORMS]" draft, Burt Kaliski
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]