Re: An implementor's agreement on "subordination"

I like your suggestion that "A's distinguished encoding should be the same
as B's for common RDNs", but I'm not sure about requiring "an entity to keep
the same distinguished encoding throughout its use of a name".  What if the
"senior" name has printable strings throughout, but a subordinate has to use
T61 for some part of its name, e.g. "Bolt Beranek & Newman, Inc."?

Charlie