If I understand Burt's proposal, it means that if my superior uses T61
encoding (say in the certificate that I am expected to be subordinate
to), then I should use T61 encoding in the RDNs that I add on (say an
OU component and the terminating CN). This would mean that I should
*not* use PrintableString for OUs below OUs (and other attributes)
that use T61. Correct?
In essence this means that the character encoding becomes part of my
DN for all practical purposes.
-Jeff
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: An implementor's agreement on "subordination", Charles W. Gardiner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: An implementor's agreement on "subordination", John Lowry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: An implementor's agreement on "subordination", James M Galvin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: An implementor's agreement on "subordination", Charles W. Gardiner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |