An implementor's agreement on "subordination"

Joe --

Thanks for supplying the ISO material.

> Why don't you like a "use Printable String where you can" rule?  It sounds
> like a defect to 9594-8 to me.

I like the rule. I just wanted to be prepared for implementors who
don't. My second choice of rule is "don't change your mind." That way
at least the DER is the same in all occurrences of the name.

Should we submit a defect report, or just publicize an implementors
agreement? How does this get done?

-- Burt