Received from a current PGP user:
While reading through the PEM RFCs I also noticed that PEM (and presumably RIPEM, but correct me if I am wrong) has no "safeguard" for "replay" attacks. PGP has a timestamp within the signature.
Any comments? Peter
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Risks of Using PGP 2.0 - sci.crypt #8150, Carl Ellison |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Risks of Using PGP 2.0 - sci.crypt #8150, Craig A. Finseth |
| Previous by Thread: | Risks of Using PGP 2.0 - sci.crypt #8150, Peter K. Boucher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: playback attacks on PEM?, Stephen D Crocker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |