pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Risks of Using PGP 2.0 - sci.crypt #8150

1992-11-16 19:31:00
In article <1e9ka5INNbmt(_at_)roche(_dot_)csl(_dot_)sri(_dot_)com>, 
boucher(_at_)csl(_dot_)sri(_dot_)com (Peter K. Boucher) writes:

|> Summary: PGP may appear to be "freeware," but there are two areas
|>        of legal risk for those who use it: patent law, and export
|>        law.
|>
|> DISCLAIMER:  The following information is provided as a public
|> service.  It is explicitly NOT a commercial advertisement, and
|> does not in any way represent, express or imply any policy or
|> viewpoint of SRI International.
|> 
|> First, it is illegal to "make, use, or sell" a patented device
|> without a license.  PGP's disclaimer does not protect anyone making,
|> distributing, or using PGP.  PKP owns the patent and sells licenses
|> to companies who want to make and sell products that use RSA and
|> other public-key cryptography.  PGP is not licensed.  A license to
|> the maker of PGP has always been (and still is) available, but it
|> would not be free (which would be unfair to other licensees, whose
|> licenses were not free).
|> 
|> Second, PGP may be illegal with respect to US export law.  The
|> author states in the documentation that he "guided" its development
|> overseas.  This might be construed an export of "technical know-how"
|> under the ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations).  By
|> distributing or using PGP 2.0, you may be involved directly or
|> indirectly in an illegal act.  Ignorance before the law, of course,
|> is no excuse.  It's the responsibility of every one to seek their
|> own legal advice.  I strongly urge potential PGP users to have their
|> company's lawyers read the ITAR and read the PGP statement before
|> making a decision.  It could be a serious mistake to assume that
|> because this software "appeared" in the US or elsewhere, it and those
|> who use it are not at any risk of violating export law.
|> 
|> The risks to those actively promoting PGP, and/or distributing it, are
|> of course, greater than those for simple users, but even simple users
|> would do well to seek an acceptable alternative, such as RIPEM.
|> RIPEM is built on a piece of software called RSAREF.  RSAREF contains
|> an embedded patent license, and is perfectly legal to use for
|> non-commercial purposes.  Any software whatsoever can be built on
|> RSAREF, even PGP-like programs, and distributed freely.  RSAREF does
|> carry strong restrictions on export.  RIPEM source and executables can
|> be found using archie.
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> -- 
|> Peter K. Boucher
|> --
|> RIPEM public key available upon request.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>