>From: Jueneman(_at_)gte(_dot_)com
>Subject: Re: X.509 v3 support
>Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 16:40:11 EST
>In addition to the impact on PEM and PEM/MIME, we have to consider the
impact
>on certificate generation systems as well as on Directory implementations,
both
>X.500 and local client/server systems such as DEC's InfoBroker. The change
in
>the semantics of the DN is going to require careful consideration and
planning.
>As I said before, it isn't at all clear that with a substantial change in
the
>DN semantics, that an implementation can easily include code to handle both
>formats, or that this would even be desirable.
I agree Bob in general.
I am tremendously worried about the change in subject DN semantics.
I must say, Warwicks note stunned me in its implications for 1422, and
similar organizational models in DMS.
Im beginning to see what Ned is saying.