Re[3]: MOSS question

Kurt...,

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re[2]: MOSS question 
Author:  kurt <kurt(_at_)RSA(_dot_)COM> at Internet
Date:    9/15/95 10:15 AM

   Yes, this is a typo.  The sentence should read.

   "...it is possible for two independent developers to come up with two 
MOSS mailers that will NOT actually "talk" to each other."

We'll make sure this gets changed in relevant documents.

Kurt Stammberger
RSA


Get's corrected as grammer in context or case in fact?

Cheers!

[ psr ]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: MOSS question, (continued) Re: MOSS question, Mark S Feldman Re: MOSS question, James M Galvin Re[2]: MOSS question, Paul Rarey Re: MOSS question, spock Re: MOSS question, Jeff Cook Re: MOSS question, Andrew Young Re: MOSS question, James M Galvin Re[2]: MOSS question, kurt Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Andrew Young Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Rich Salz Re[3]: MOSS question, Paul Rarey <= Re: MOSS question, Dave Crocker Re[2]: MOSS question, spock Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Ned Freed Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Jueneman Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Ned Freed Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Ray Langford Re[2]: MOSS question, Dave Crocker Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Dennis Doubleday Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Ned Freed

Previous by Date:	Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Andrew Young
Next by Date:	MOSS, MHS Mail
Previous by Thread:	Re: Re[2]: MOSS question, Rich Salz
Next by Thread:	Re: MOSS question, Dave Crocker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]