pem-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: MOSS question

1995-09-15 10:54:00
     Yes, this is a typo.  The sentence should read.
     
     "...it is possible for two independent developers to come up with two 
MOSS mailers that will NOT actually "talk" to each other."

We'll make sure this gets changed in relevant documents.

Kurt Stammberger
RSA


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: MOSS question 
Author:  Jeff Cook <jvc(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM> at INTERNET
Date:    9/14/95 12:45 PM


Received: by ccmail from RSA.COM
From pem-dev-request(_at_)neptune(_dot_)tis(_dot_)com 
X-Envelope-From: pem-dev-request(_at_)neptune(_dot_)tis(_dot_)com 
Received: from neptune.tis.com by RSA.COM with SMTP
    id AA24019; Thu, 14 Sep 95 12:39:18 PDT
Received: by neptune.TIS.COM id aa24316; 14 Sep 95 14:53 EDT 
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa23901;
          14 Sep 95 14:26 EDT
Received: from relay.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa23895; 14 Sep 95 14:15 EDT 
Received: from sol.tis.com(192.33.112.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (g3.0.1)
    id xma019509; Thu, 14 Sep 95 14:03:56 -0400
Received: from la.tis.com (scintillate.la.tis.com) by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64)
    id AA23546; Thu, 14 Sep 95 14:14:40 EDT
Received: from mika.la.tis.com by la.tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64)
    id AA25631; Thu, 14 Sep 95 11:13:31 PDT
Message-Id: <9509141813(_dot_)AA25631(_at_)la(_dot_)tis(_dot_)com> 
To: Adrienne Snyder <ajs(_at_)unx(_dot_)dec(_dot_)com>
Cc: pem-dev(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM
Subject: Re: MOSS question 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 14 Sep 1995 13:35:02 EDT."
             
<9509141735(_dot_)AA11138(_at_)stamp(_dot_)unx(_dot_)dec(_dot_)com> 
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 11:13:37 -0700 
From: Jeff Cook <jvc(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM>  
MOSS is designed to overcome the limitations of PEM by 
handling MIME messages and being more liberal in the
hierarchy requirements.  But MOSS has so many implementation 
options that it is possible for two independent developers
to come up with two MOSS mailers that will actually "talk"
to each other.  MOSS can be thought of as a framework rather 
than a specification, and considerable work in
implementation profiling has yet to be done.
     
Something is wrong with the wording of the paragraph above.  I expected it to 
say "impossible for two independent".  Where is this S/MIME FAQ? ...Jeff


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>