I also agree with Donald that this is going to be a *very* command use for
^common
signatures in the future. As such, I could argue quite effectively for inclusion of prose in the specification that says that the preferred sequence should be encrypt then sign. Do you really want that?
Ned
Previous by Date: | Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols, Ned Freed |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols, Ned Freed |
Previous by Thread: | Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols, Ned Freed |
Next by Thread: | Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols, Mark S Feldman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |