Re: Unicode aware module

On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 05:32:11PM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:

I do not think we need more than two internal encodings: a quick
American, and a slow Universal.


There are a lot of existing scripts happily procssing iso-8859-1
as the de-facto 8-bit standard. We need to consider their "rôle" too ;-)


For the topic of discussion iso-8859-1 is still "a quick American
encoding".

Ilya

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Unicode aware module, (continued) Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Nick Ing-Simmons Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich <= Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Tom Christiansen Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Tom Christiansen Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich Re: Unicode aware module, Nick Ing-Simmons Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy

Previous by Date:	Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich
Next by Date:	Re: Unicode aware module, Ilya Zakharevich
Previous by Thread:	Re: Unicode aware module, Nick Ing-Simmons
Next by Thread:	Re: Unicode aware module, Gurusamy Sarathy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]