On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 01:24 Asia/Tokyo,
<jarkko(_dot_)hietaniemi(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'll fix it but withhold from $Encode::VERSION++ since the table
itself
appears correct.
But now we have no TIS620, then, so that needs to be added?
Well, unless I hear requests from Thai native users, I'll abstain since
TIS620 did not exist in http://www.unicode.org/Public/. So far as I
see ISO-8859-11 suffices.
But once again I am only human so correct me if I am wrong.
Dan the Man with Too Many Encodings to Support; Too Many Typos Generated