--- Nicholas Clark <nick(_at_)ccl4(_dot_)org> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:34:02AM -0700, rajarshi
das wrote:
Yes, the second call to NATIVE_TO_UTF is still
present
in the modified code. Typically, one wouldnt want
to
do a NATIVE_TO_UTF(NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv)) which is
what I
am doing due to the second call. But does that
make a
difference to miniperl ?
Well, the code is linked into miniperl, so I can
only assume that it's
getting called.
If so, does removing the second instance of
NATIVE_TO_UTF() improve things?
No it doesnt. The same error messages are generated.
Thanks,
Rajarshi.
Nicholas Clark
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
