procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Procmail and Elm's frm?

1995-10-17 04:15:33
I'm using "procmail" with Elm and most of my mail, thrown by procmail,
seems to be "read", when I *haven't*, or at least that is what Elm's
"frm" says.
Is there some kind of flag(s) in the mail-box-files to indicate this?
Does the Access, Change, and Modify times of the file play any role?

My own fix for this problem is to force a new header line into incoming
mail by this recipe:

# Recipe: Fix bug in elm's frm program that doesn't recognise new mail.
# Flags: Use this recipe as a filter.
# Action: Use formail to add the header "Status: N"
:0 f
| formail -a "Status: N"

It's a little inefficient but it mostly works.

-- 
Tim Pickett                                     
tlm(_at_)yoyo(_dot_)cc(_dot_)monash(_dot_)edu(_dot_)au
"Whoa, what a swim!"                           
tbp(_at_)molly(_dot_)cs(_dot_)monash(_dot_)edu(_dot_)au

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>