On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
Formail processes this as
Message 1
Message 2 + Message 3
Message 4
Show the last three lines of message 2 and the first five lines of
message 3 (i.e. when such a misfiling occurred).
I'm sending a few extra lines along... Note that the first Received:
header below appears as one long header line while the others are wrapped
to the next line with the blank space in column one.
|wrote about the No-Tenna on this list. It is not very long.
|
|Dave
|davem0911(_at_)aol(_dot_)com
|All Ohio Scanner Club.
|
|From POPmail Mon Nov 20 18:20:03 1995
|Received: from VAXA.STEVENS-TECH.EDU
(SYSTEM(_at_)vaxa(_dot_)stevens-tech(_dot_)edu
|[155.246.1.2]) by menger.eecs.stevens-tech.edu (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP
|id SAA10588 for <apu(_at_)menger(_dot_)eecs(_dot_)stevens-tech(_dot_)edu>;
Mon, 20 Nov 1995
|18:09:11 -0500
|Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 18:09:11 -0500
|Resent-From: owner-action(_at_)eff(_dot_)org
|Received: from VAXC.STEVENS-TECH.EDU by VAXC.STEVENS-TECH.EDU
| (PMDF V4.3-10 #2500) id
<01HXVI327AZ0928Z03(_at_)VAXC(_dot_)STEVENS-TECH(_dot_)EDU>; Mon,
| 20 Nov 1995 17:44:47 -0500 (EST)
|Received: from eff.org by VAXC.STEVENS-TECH.EDU (PMDF V4.3-10 #2500)
| id <01HXVHJAA8GG929JK7(_at_)VAXC(_dot_)STEVENS-TECH(_dot_)EDU>; Mon,
| 20 Nov 1995 17:29:44 -0500 (EST)
|Received: (from daemon(_at_)localhost) by eff.org (8.6.12/8.6.6)
| id NAA14915 for action-exploder; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 13:39:03 -0800
To the other issues brought forward in this series:
- I'd keep the original version of the mail around so I can look at
how the mail appears before formail but I don't have sufficient
disk space to save both the filtered and unfiltered version long
enough to have actually gotten far enough along in my mail to have
found the misfilings--especially since they are so infrequent.
Yes, I know I need more disk space.
- I haven't tried the switch to 'formail -es' vs. '-s' though I may
do so soon. I wanted to get a header sample like Stephen asked for
above before changing something and not knowing if what I changed
helped, or am I just being lucky and not getting any misfilings.
- Someone mentioned having a similar problem and fixing it by having
popclient give the message directly to procmail (the local delivery
agent). I have the delivery agent setup, but as the mail doesn't
come through SMTP it doesn't matter...as far as having popclient hand
off the mail, what command line do you use? I couldn't get that to
work originally and that is the reason I went with the post-process
method.
Thanks to everybody for their help.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apu(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)apu(_at_)menger(_dot_)eecs(_dot_)stevens-tech(_dot_)edu
WARNING: I DISCRIMINATE
E-mail is dealt with immediately;
Snail mail, if I have nothing to do (never) or I'm bored (sometimes)