Sacha Sardo Infirri <sacha(_at_)kurims(_dot_)kyoto-u(_dot_)ac(_dot_)jp> writes:
It appears the the message is being generated by a
recipe of a slightly different structure:
------------------
:0
* cond1
{
:0 c
* cond3
! someone(_at_)blah(_dot_)blah
:0:
Personal/personal.mail
}
------------------
This should not generate the warning. Bear in mind that the warning
is emitted *after* the conditions are checked, but *before* the nested
recipes are examined.
Is it ok to put
:0
Personal/personal.mail
in the last recipe of the block?
Unless Personal/personal.mail is a directory, I would not do so.
If it's in berkeley mbox format then you should definately leave
the colon there.
Philip Guenther