Jim Dennis wrote:
I'm not Stephen but I've heard (and seem to recall)
that the :x used to a count of how many of the
subsequent lines were part of this recipe -- or how
many of them were conditions for this recipe.
Later :0 meant that procmail should parse them and
automatically deal with however many conditional
and other lines it found.
I'm not even sure if :x (for values of x other than
0) is even supported in recent versions of procmail.
--
Jim Dennis,
info(_at_)mail(_dot_)starshine(_dot_)org
Proprietor,
consulting(_at_)mail(_dot_)starshine(_dot_)org
Starshine Technical Services http://www.starshine.org
Hmm. I´m using 3.11pre4 and never used values other than "0:".
Anyway, thanks for the info!
--
======================================================
Alvaro Fernandez Lago alago(_at_)unicies(_dot_)cesga(_dot_)es
Org: Hospital Xeral de Vigo - Spain
======================================================