procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is the use of EXITCODE in procmail recipe totally functional?

1997-02-21 18:31:13
On Fri, 21 Feb 1997 15:50:02 -0600 (CST),
in article <m0vy2qw-000k6kC(_at_)miso(_dot_)wwa(_dot_)com>, 
dattier(_at_)wwa(_dot_)com (David W. Tamkin) wrote:

Since Debra is experimenting on mail she receives from Juno, I gather she
is doing that testing at her account on WWA.  Also, the "#debraw" in the
.forward she showed us matches her WWA logname but not her Juno logname.

Correct...  I have procmail running in my WWA shell.

WWA runs Smail, not sendmail.  Smail does not care about exit codes set by a
program called in .forward.

I can use those exitcode tricks at my account on EnterAct, but they don't
work on WWA, period, and I'm sure that Smail (EnterAct uses sendmail) is
the reason.

Wow...:)...  I have a feeling that you have "hit the nail on the head",
so to speak.  Since you are a fellow WWA user, and I trust your
judgement (from following your posts for a while), I really appreciate
your feedback.  I have been spending lots of time, trying to solve this
mystery lately.  Now, I see that there is a major clue, regarding why
my efforts in experimentation here have failed.

If anyone knows how to make exitcode tricks work with Smail, Debra and I
would be very grateful for the information.

Yes, indeed.  Or, in my case, could someone, at least, point me to a
source (or sources) of basic information about Smail,
e.g. FAQ's, newsgroups, Web sites, etc.?  That would be really helpful.

Thanks a lot for your post, David.  And, thanks, in advance, for any
other suggestions/responses.

Debra Walker
-- 
Debra Walker            debraw(_at_)wwa(_dot_)com          
Chicago, IL             debra42(_at_)juno(_dot_)com 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>