I would say that this is a prime example of work in action and how it can
be used by a group to solve a problem. Where else can you get an
accidental spam and have people provide a solution in about an hour as to
how to fix it. I don't have local support that is this good! Keep up the
good work procmailers!
Cliff
*************************************************************************
*Cliff Friedel * *
*cfriedel(_at_)penn(_dot_)com *
*
*jchan(_at_)elektra(_dot_)warbeast(_dot_)com *
*
***************************************** *
*For Technical Questions * *
*please contact: * *
***************************************** *
*sysadmin(_at_)penn(_dot_)com *
*
*************************************************************************
On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Reuben Kabel wrote:
If this were another mailing list, I would agree with you, however, much
of the traffic on this list is dedicated to the thwarting of spam. Thus,
when an opportunity such as this presents itself, do not be surprised if
it is discussed and analyzed.
--
ttfn -reub
On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Ian Southam wrote:
Hi,
What gets me about all this talk of spam can be neatly summed up with this
latest Cheese Ball post.
Her we have one tiny mail advertising some recipe, it took virtually none
of my bandwidth but, as a result of it, I have had to download another six
messages discussing it ....
Ironic??
---
Ian Southam
Rayware Limited, Liverpool, England