Re: Message tag suffix

procmail

Re: Message tag suffix

1997-09-04 14:34:17

Excerpts from mail: (03-Sep-97) Re: Message tag suffix by David W Tamkin

As I discussed when similar code came up in another thread, I don't
think that the trailing newline will cause a problem, and the second
condition is likely unnecessary:


Frankly, I don't believe that (though I haven't tested it or looked at the
source code) and, if your statement is true, I would consider it a major bug!

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Message tag suffix, Robert Gahl Re: Message tag suffix, David W. Tamkin Re: Message tag suffix, Robert Gahl Re: Message tag suffix, Edward J. Sabol Re: Message tag suffix, David W. Tamkin Re: Message tag suffix, Robert Gahl Re: Message tag suffix, David W. Tamkin Re: Message tag suffix, Edward J. Sabol <= Re: Message tag suffix, David W. Tamkin Re: Message tag suffix, Edward J. Sabol Re: Message tag suffix, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 perl in procmail, Tomas Karlsson Re: perl in procmail, era eriksson

Previous by Date:	Modifying a message within procmailrc, W. Wesley Groleau x4923
Next by Date:	Re: Modifying a message within procmailrc, W. Wesley Groleau x4923
Previous by Thread:	Re: Message tag suffix, David W. Tamkin
Next by Thread:	Re: Message tag suffix, David W. Tamkin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]